Cloak

Why Cloak Looks Like a Terminal

Cloak is a terminal-style AI sidekick for Mac because quick questions need speed, privacy boundaries, keyboard flow and a little character.

Cloak is deliberately not trying to look like a normal AI chat app.

That was the point from the beginning. The Mac already has polished, full-screen, document-style AI tools. They are good at long conversations, research sessions, image generation, file uploads and deep context.

Cloak is for a different moment: the small question that appears while you are already working.

What is the command again? How do I phrase this more clearly? What does this error mean? What is the tiny Swift syntax detail I have forgotten for the third time this week?

Those questions do not always need a new browser tab, an account, a history sidebar and a whole workspace. Sometimes they need a fast panel and a clean answer.

Cloak for Mac shown as a terminal-style AI sidekick
Cloak is designed as a small, summonable Mac surface instead of another full workspace.

The terminal shape makes the product clearer

The terminal aesthetic is not just decoration. It communicates what Cloak is for:

  • short prompts
  • keyboard-first use
  • visible provider state
  • quick answers
  • no social-feed feeling
  • no pretend productivity dashboard

The design gives Cloak a boundary. It feels like a tool you summon, use, and dismiss.

That is important because AI apps can easily expand until they become vague. Cloak tries to stay specific.

The provider choice is part of the design

Cloak supports Apple Intelligence, local Llama, Claude and OpenAI because the right AI provider depends on the prompt.

For some questions, on-device is the right answer. For others, a stronger cloud model is useful. Cloak makes that choice explicit rather than hiding it behind one generic assistant label.

The local options matter because they give the app a private baseline. The cloud options matter because people already have model preferences and API keys. Cloak keeps both paths in one small Mac surface.

Why ephemeral can be a feature

Most AI products treat conversation history as a core feature. That is often useful, but it also changes how the app feels.

Cloak is designed around ephemeral use. You ask, get the answer, and move on. That makes the app feel lighter. It also fits the kinds of prompts Cloak is best at: recall, rewording, commands, small explanations and quick checks.

Long memory is valuable when you are building a project inside a chat. Cloak is more like a terminal command: run it, use the result, continue working.

A small app can have a stronger identity

The Mac has always had room for opinionated utilities. The best ones do not try to be everything. They own one interaction and make it feel unusually good.

That is what Cloak is aiming for.

Press Command Shift Space. Type the question. Pick the provider if needed. Read the answer. Escape back to work.

The design is a reminder of the promise: fast, local where possible, direct when cloud is chosen, and small enough to stay out of the way.

That is why Cloak looks like a terminal.